Why intel!?!?!?!

Intel 82810E Graphics Controller is one of the worst thing's to ever be made (it's in my computer!?!?!?!) I think intel need's to die.Why intel!?!?!?!
That chipset was made for the Pentium III, time to upgrade.Why intel!?!?!?!
Their actually really good, you just bought a cheap laptop/computer.
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
My dad did, he bought it back in 2001 and it cost him $800.00 because he bought it from the local Office Max and it came with some real nice photo editing software, it can play some game's but only if there from the year 2000 and before.
then why are you complaining?
Because it's so old.
Are you like... trying to be funny? Cuz I don't get it.
[QUOTE=''yrh2009'']Because it's so old.[/QUOTE]So Intel needs to die because... its an old company? :lol:
I am not trying to be funny if you are only here to talk **** about me then you might as well go else where cause this is about talking **** about the graphic's controller mention in the first post not why am I complaining about it.
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Sorry chuck but your not funny stop trying to act like a jock cause you fail (EPIC FAIL 101 with your teacher the poster above this post) anyway this thing is **** at it's finest and I am forced to use it because my good computer's boot file is broken and since im so poor (which your about to point out) that i cant even buy a install disc for window's.
I don't understand why you're coming hear and whining. Yeah, it may suck but so does every other computer part from 2000. What is the point in this thread :S?
Well it is old.........................but then again Intel is still infamous for crappy on-board graphics...............
Intel is bad with graphic's they should of been processor only (processor's are the pimp) and graphics are bad.
We'll see what happens with Larrabee......
[QUOTE=''yrh2009'']Intel is bad with graphic's they should of been processor only (processor's are the pimp) and graphics are bad.[/QUOTE] Only their old onboard things are bad. And it was either that or the price of your computer was yoinked up as you'd have to pay for an independant GPU as well as the PSU to power it. That onboard GPU is only aimed for basic 3d work and not gaming. So it is fit for purpose and does exactly what it is supposed to.And well, you might be eating those words soon enough when Intel release their proper ray tracing GPUs code named Larrabee.
[QUOTE=''death1505921''] [QUOTE=''yrh2009'']Intel is bad with graphic's they should of been processor only (processor's are the pimp) and graphics are bad.[/QUOTE] Only their old onboard things are bad. And it was either that or the price of your computer was yoinked up as you'd have to pay for an independant GPU as well as the PSU to power it. That onboard GPU is only aimed for basic 3d work and not gaming. So it is fit for purpose and does exactly what it is supposed to.And well, you might be eating those words soon enough when Intel release their proper ray tracing GPUs code named Larrabee. [/QUOTE]OMG haha that just reminded me of the anime Boccano! i think no one is gonna get the reference to rail tracer but.... OMG ITS RAY TRACER!!!!!
It is the cheapest graphics chip out in the market. It was like 20 bucks at the time if there was a street price.
[QUOTE=''theking52_TDK'']Ohhhh... I get it.You're an idiot, right?Well, it's kinda funny. [/QUOTE] lol